4.0 Article

Catalepsy intensifies context-dependently irrespective of whether it is induced by intermittent or chronic dopamine deficiency

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 49-53

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200302000-00005

Keywords

6-OHDA; haloperidol; Parkinson's disease; behavioural sensitization; context-dependency; catalepsy; dopamine; rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that neuroleptic-induced catalepsy in rats intensifies upon repeated testing. Here, the question is addressed whether intensification of catalepsy results from intermittent drug administration or from intermittent context exposure. In experiment 1, rats were treated with intermittent haloperidol injections (0.25 mg/kg) followed by the catalepsy test (descent latency from the horizontal bar). In experiment 2, rats were lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine injections into the striatum, resulting in a 45% reduction of dopamine concentration. Catalepsy was tested intermittently for several weeks. In both experiments we found a very stable intensification of catalepsy over 9 (haloperidol rats) and 11 (lesioned rats) days, showing that intensification is not due to intermittent dopamine depletion. In both experiments, intensification of catalepsy was very stable and was observed 18 days later in haloperidol-treated rats and 101 days later in lesioned animals. However, a change of the environmental context abolished the intensified catalepsy in both experiments. It is concluded that intensification of catalepsy is due to intermittent context exposure rather than intermittent drug administration. It is generally accepted that 6-hydroxydopamine lesions represent an animal model of Parkinson's disease. Given the results above, context-dependent intensification of parkinsonian symptoms might also occur in Parkinson's disease, and its prevention should be taken into consideration for future therapy of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available