4.2 Article

The extent and distribution of cell death and matrix damage in impacted chondral explants varies with the presence of underlying bone

Journal

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.1536654

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ODCDC CDC HHS [R49/CCR503607] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excessive mechanical loading can lead to matrix damage and chondrocyte death in articular cartilage. Previous studies on chondral and osteochondral explants have not clearly distinguished to what extent the degree and the distribution of cell death are dependent on the presence of an underlying layer of bone. The current study hypothesized that the presence of underlying bone would decrease the amount of matrix damage and cell death. Chondral and osteochondral explants were loaded to 30 MPa at a high rate of loading (similar to600 Wals) or at a low rate of loading (30 Wals). After 24 hours in culture, matrix damage was assessed by the total length and average depth of surface fissures. The explants were also sectioned and stained for cell viability in the various layers of the cartilage. More matrix damage was documented in chondral than osteochondral explants for each rate of loading experiment. The total amount of cell death was also less in osteochondral explants than chondral explants. The presence of underlying bone significantly reduced the extent of cell death in all zones in low rate of loading tests. The percentage of cell death was also reduced in the intermediate zone and deep zones of the explant by the presence of the underlying bone for a high rate of loading. This study indicated that the presence of underlying bone significantly limited the degree of matrix damage and cell death, and also affected the distribution of dead cells through the explant thickness. These data may have relevance to the applicability of experimental data from chondral explants to the in situ condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available