4.7 Article

The effect of unselected post-operative nutritional supplementation on nutritional status and clinical outcome of orthopaedic patients

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 39-46

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2002.0588

Keywords

orthopaedics; nutritional supplements; major complications; cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Nutritional supplements are widely administered in hospitals and can benefit clinical outcome. The aim here was to determine the effect of routine post-operative nutritional supplementation on the nutritional status and clinical outcome of adult orthopaedic patients. Methods: A prospective controlled study was conducted on two adult orthopaedic wards. Patients in the study group were prescribed two nutritional supplements/day post-operatively. Nutritional and biochemical indices and incidence of clinical complications were observed. Results: Of 181 patients studied, 14 in the supplemented group and 34 in the control (P=0.005) developed major complications. There were 22 occurrences of major complications in the supplemented group and 55 in the control (P=0.0002). There was no significant difference in the number of minor complications between the two groups (P=0.2). There was no statistical difference in changes in nutritional parameters or in albumin or CRP between the two groups. There were significantly greater reductions in transferrin (P=0.002) and in haemoglobin (P=0.002) in the control group at week 1. The median costs of hospital stay were in the supplemented group and pound2199 in the control. The median cost of additional treatments was pound30.16 in the supplemented group and pound46.23 in the control. Conclusion: A significant reduction in major complications and in number and costs of additional treatments was seen in the supplemented group. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available