4.3 Article

How sleep is related to fatigue

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 95-105

Publisher

BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1348/135910703762879237

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. It is evident that sleep patterns have direct effects on fatigue. However, the multidimensionality of fatigue may imply that complex patterns of relationships exist between fatigue and sleep characteristics. We aimed to study the correlations between fatigue and quantitative and qualitative sleep measurements, while taking into consideration depression and somatization which are known to affect both sleep and fatigue. We, predicted that sleep quality, unattained by the effects of somatization and depression, would affect perceived fatigue more than the quantitative characteristics of sleep. Design. Employing a cross-sectional design, hypotheses were addressed using multiple hierarchical regression analyses according to established methods. Methods. Data were gathered from a targeted, randomly selected adult sample (N = 278) by means' of subjective sleep reports,,a men tal health inventory, somatization inventory, several fatigue questionnaires and a demographic questionnaire. Results. Fatigue was significantly predicted by depression scores, somatization levels and subjective sleep quality, but not quantitative sleep characteristics such as sleep latency, nocturnal awakenings and early morning arousals. Depression levels were positively and significantly related to all aspects of fatigue except physical fatigue and fatigue that responds to rest and, sleep. Physical fatigue was correlated with somatization,but not depression. Conclusions. the data further our understanding of the multifaceted nature of human fatigue and underline the greater importance of perceived sleep quality, compared to other sleep characteristics, in predicting fatigue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available