4.2 Review

Chemosensory factors influencing alcohol perception, preferences, and consumption

Journal

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 220-231

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000051021.99641.19

Keywords

alcohol; ethanol; taste; olfaction; smell; drinking; perception; genetics; learning; development

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA09523, R01 AA11028, R01 AA009523, R01 AA011028, R21 AA11867, R01 AA011028-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC000882-24, R01 DC 00283, R01 DC000882, R01 DC000283] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2002 RSA/ISBRA Meeting in San Francisco, California, co-organized by Julie A. Mennella and Alexander A. Bachmanov of the Monell Chemical Senses Center. The goal of this symposium was to review the role that chemosensory factors (taste, smell, and chemical irritation) play in the perception, preference, and consumption of alcohol. The presented research focused on both humans and laboratory animals and used a variety of approaches including genetic, developmental, pharmacological, behavioral, and psychophysical studies. The presentations were as follows: (1) Introduction and overview of the chemical senses (Julie A. Mennella and Alexander A. Bachmanov); (2) Taste reactivity as a measure of alcohol palatability and its relation to alcohol consumption in rats (Stephen W. Kiefer); (3) Early learning about the sensory properties of alcohol in laboratory animals (Juan Carlos Molina); (4) Early learning about the sensory properties of alcohol in humans (Julie A. Mennella); (5) Genetic dissection of the ethanol-sweet taste relationship in mice (Alexander A. Bachmanov and Michael Tordoff); and (6) Human genetic variation in taste: connections with alcohol sensation and intake (Valerie B. Duffy and Linda M. Bartoshuk). The symposium concluded with a general discussion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available