4.5 Article

Characterization of effects of mean arterial blood pressure induced by cocaine and cocaine methiodide on BOLD signals in rat brain

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 264-270

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10366

Keywords

rat brain; cocaine; cocaine methiodide; mean arterial blood pressure; fMRI; BOLD

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA010214, DA10214] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A total of 45 male Sprague-Dawley rats were employed to determine whether cocaine or cocaine methiodide (CM) administration can induce a significant increase in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in rats, and whether such an increase in MABP can produce a global increase in blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast in the rat brain detectable by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Cocaine methiodide is a quaternary derivative of cocaine that shares the same cardiovascular effects of cocaine, but does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Experimental results demonstrated that both CM (with doses of 2.5 and 7.5 mg/kg) and cocaine (with doses of 1.25 and 5.0 mg/kg) can induce a significant MABP change (30-80%). It was found that CM can only produce scattered, weak, and transient BOLD signals in a few voxels of the rat brain, and that these MABP-induced BOLD signals are not dose-dependent. In contrast, the administration of cocaine induced dose-dependent biphasic BOLD signals that were consistent with pharmacologically-induced cerebral vascular constriction and neuronal activity in the mesolimbic systems of the rat brain. The potential confounding factor of the MABP changes had little effect on the interpretation of drug-induced BOLD signal changes. These results confirm that the BOLD-weighted fMRI method can be extended to map drug-induced neuronal activity. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available