4.0 Article

Activity of Anticancer Agents in a Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Model

Journal

ASSAY AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 581-590

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/adt.2010.0276

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Kansas Endowment Association
  2. University of Kansas Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell-monolayer-based assays for chemotherapeutic drug discovery have proven to be highly artificial compared with physiological systems. The objective of this study was to culture cancer cells in a simple 3-dimensional (3D) collagen gel model to study the antiproliferative activity of known lung cancer drugs. The validity of our 3D model was tested by measuring the activity of 10 lung cancer drugs (Paclitaxel, Alimta, Zactima, Doxorubicin, Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, 17AAg, Cisplatin, and 2 experimental drugs from the University of Kansas [KU174 and KU363]) in 2 lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H358) and comparing the activity in a traditional 2-dimensional (2D) in vitro cellular assay. Both potency and efficacy of these drugs were calculated to evaluate the activity of the drugs. Our results demonstrate that the activity of these drugs showed significant differences when tested in 3D cultures, which varied with individual drugs and the cell line used for testing. For example, the cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel, KU174, Alimta, Zacitma, Doxorubicin, Vinorelbine, KU363, and 17AAg was significantly changed when tested in the 3D model, whereas the potency of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in H358 cell line remained unaffected. A similar pattern, with some differences, was observed in A549 cells and is discussed in detail in this article. The observed differences in potency and efficacy of the cancer drugs in 3D models suggest that the biological implications of screening configurations should be taken into account to select superior cancer drug candidates in preclinical studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available