4.8 Article

Application of 'waste' metal hydroxide sludge for adsorption of azo reactive dyes

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 763-772

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00375-5

Keywords

adsorption; desorption; ion exchange; metal hydroxides; reactive dyes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capacity and mechanism of metal hydroxide sludge in removing azo reactive dyes from aqueous solution was investigated with different parameters, such as charge amount of dyes, system pH, adsorbent particle size, and adsorbent dosage. The three anionic dyes used were CI Reactive Red 2, CI Reactive Red 120, and CI Reactive Red 141, increasing in number of sulfonic groups, respectively. Only 0.2%` (w/v) of powdered sludge (< 75 mum) achieved color removal from 30 mg l(-1) reactive dye solutions within 5min without pH adjustment. The larger the charge amount of the dyes, the greater the adsorption (> 90%) on the metal hydroxide sludge. The system pH played a significant role in the adsorption on metal hydroxides and formation of dye-metal complexes. The optimum system pH for dye adsorption was 8-9 which was close to the pH(zpc) of the sludge while the precipitation of dye-metal complexes occurred at system pH 2. The maximum adsorption capacity (Qdegrees) of the sludge for the reactive dyes was 48-62 mg dye g(-1) adsorbent. The Langmuir and Freundlich models showed that the higher charged dyes had a higher affinity of adsorption. The smaller particle size and the greater amount of adsorbent showed the faster process, due to an increase in surface area of adsorbent. Desorption studies elucidated that metal hydroxide sludge had a tendency for ion exchange adsorption of sulfonated azo reactive dyes. Leaching data showed that the treated water was nontoxic at a system pH above 5 or a solution pH above 2. (C) 2002 Elsevier science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available