4.7 Article

Numerical modelling of ductile plastic damage in bulk metal forming

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 273-294

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00051-1

Keywords

bulk metal forming; damage mechanics; finite-element method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work addresses the computational aspects of a model for rigid-plastic damage. The model is a modification of a previous established model formulated by Perzyna (Recent Advances in Applied Mechanics, Academic Press: New York, 1966, p. 243-377 (Chapter 9)) which is here extended to include isotropic damage. Such an extension is obtained by incorporating the constitutive equations introduced by Lemaitre (J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 107 (1985) 83; Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 51 (1985) 31; A Course on Damage Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1996) for ductile plastic damage into the original model. In its original version (J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 107 (1985) 83; Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 51 (1985) 31) this model does not distinguish tension and compression in the damage evolution law, so it was necessary to introduce a refinement proposed by Ladeveze (in: J.P. Boehler, (Ed.), Proceedings of CNRS International Colloquium 351 Villars-de-Lans, France (Failure Criteria of Structured Media, 1983, p. 355) and Lemaitre (A Course on Damage Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1996) which takes into account the partial crack closure effect with isotropic damage. The accuracy of the computational model, developed for the analysis of the material degradation in bulk metal forming processes, is shown through the discussion of the results of two examples, allowing to compare the simulation results with experimental and numerical results obtained by other authors. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available