4.7 Article

Posterior pituitary bright spot in large adenomas: MR assessment of its disappearance or relocation along the stalk

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 226, Issue 2, Pages 359-365

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2262011616

Keywords

diabetes insipidus; pituitary, MR; pituitary, neoplasms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To evaluate the disappearance or relocation patterns of posterior pituitary bright spot (PPBS) in the infundibuloneurohypophyseal (INH) system and endocrinologic implications in large pituitary adenomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with adenoma and supradiaphragmatic extension were classified into PPBS-visible and PPBS-nonvisible groups on the basis of findings at preoperative T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The adenoma shapes were classified into hourglass type with indentation and barrel type without indentation at the diaphragmatic level. RESULTS: The PPBS-visible group included 55 (80%) patients. PPBS most commonly occurred at the distal pituitary stalk immediately above the diaphragm in 48 patients with hourglass-type adenoma. In the remaining seven patients with barrel-type adenoma, PPBS occurred in the sella or in varying sites along the pituitary stalk. Postoperatively, two patients, whose PPBS became nonvisible, developed persistent diabetes insipidus. The PPBS-nonvisible group included 14 (20%) patients. Five had hourglass-type and nine had barrel-type adenoma. Occurrence of the barrel type was marked. In these patients, four developed postoperative permanent diabetes insipidus. CONCLUSION: The diaphragm, a probable major anatomic determinant of indentation, may serve as a transportation blockade and facilitate proximal accumulation of PP13S material, as evidenced in the hourglass-type adenoma. PPBS was more commonly nonnvisible in the barrel-type adenoma. The presence of PPBS in the INH system indicates its functional maintenance in large adenomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available