4.4 Article

The human umbilical cord blood: A potential source for osteoblast progenitor cells

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 135-142

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-002-2002-9

Keywords

osteoblasts; mesenchymal stem cells; differentiation; adipocytes; marrow stromal cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of non-hematopoietic stem cells in the human umbilical cord blood (hUCB) is debated. In this study, we report the isolation of a population of fibroblast-like cells with osteogenic and adipogenic potential that resembles the stromal stem cells found in the bone marrow. Low-density mononuclear cells isolated from hUCB formed few adherent colonies with fibroblast-like morphology after a few days in culture. At confluence, the polyclonal cell populations were characterized. Using FACS analysis and immunocytochemistry, the cells were found to express HLA-ABC, CD9, vimentin, the beta subunit of prolyl-4-hydroxylase, integrins alpha1(CD49a), integrin alpha3 (CD49c), integrin alpha5(CD49e), and cytokeratin 18. Furthermore, the cells expressed constitutively transcripts of osteoblast-specific markers: Cbfa1/Runx2, alkaline phosphatase (AP), and collagen type 1, and formed a mineralized matrix in vitro visualized by Alizarin red staining. In the presence of normal horse serum and dexamethasone (10(-7) M), the cells formed foci of adipocytes. When the cells were implanted mixed with hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate powder in the subcutis of immunocompromised mice for 8 weeks, they formed osteogenic tissue and a myelosupportive microenviroment that enclosed hematopoietic cells and adipocytes. Our results demonstrate the presence of circulating stem cells with osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential in hUCB and may encourage the use of hUCB as a potential source for stem cells to be utilized in cell therapy protocols for various diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available