4.6 Article

Why do cereal-legume intercrops support large earthworm populations?

Journal

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 181-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00131-2

Keywords

cover crop; direct drilling; food rcsources; Lumbricidae; living mulch; slurry fertilizer; tillage

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relative importance of reduced soil disturbance and increased food supply in supporting large earthworm populations in cereal-legume intercropping systems was investigated in two replicated field experiments over a 3-year period. In the first experiment, the effects of the absence of tillage and the presence of a permanent white clover understorey on earthworm populations were assessed in three winter wheat cropping systems. The mean earthworm abundance as assessed by electrical extraction in conventional wheat, direct drilled wheat and direct-drilled wheat-clover intercrops was 211, 280 and 572 individuals m(-2) and the corresponding earthworm biomass was 62, 92 and 203 g m(-2). In the second experiment, the effects of dairy cattle slurry and mineral fertilizer applications on earthworm populations in wheat-clover intercropping systems were assessed. Neither the input of additional organic matter (as slurry) nor mineral N fertilization increased earthworm population levels which were already remarkably high, averaging 1097 individuals m(-2) and 266 g biomass m(-2) in the third year of the experiment. These results suggest that while the absence of ploughing alone had only a modest effect, the combination of absence of ploughing and presence of a clover understorey increased earthworm populations greatly. It is concluded that cereal-legume intercrops support large earthworm populations primarily because the organic matter input from such systems is favourable for earthworms in terms of quantity, quality and continuity of food supply throughout the year. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available