3.8 Article

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 102-107

Publisher

ARNOLD, HODDER HEADLINE PLC
DOI: 10.1191/1352458503ms880sr

Keywords

acute optic neuritis; cerebrospinal fluid immunology; gadolinium-enhancement; immunoglobulins; magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oral high-dose methylprednisolone treatment is efficacious in acute optic neuritis (ON) and attacks of multiple sclerosis (MS). The responses to treatment in subgroups of patients participating in two randomized, controlled trials were assessed. Fifty-eight patients with ON and 51 patients with attacks of MS were treated with placebo or oral methylprednisolone (500 mg daily for five days with a 10-day tapering period). A gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was obtained at baseline in 66 patients, and 29 patients underwent repeated MRI studies. Seventy-four patients underwent lumbar puncture before treatment. The odds ratio (OR) of improvement after methylprednisolone treatment (a one point change in the visual function system score of the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in ON or in the EDSS score in attacks of MS) was higher in patients with enhancing lesions on baseline MRI (one week OR 15, P = 0.02, eight weeks: OR 4.6, P = 0.02). Methylprednisolone treatment suppressed Gd-enhancement after one week (P < 0.001) and three weeks (P = 0.001). Cerebrospinal fluid measures of intrathecal inflammation correlated with the area of Gd-enhancement but did not correlate as closely with the treatment response as did the results of Gd-enhanced MRI. These findings suggest that the resolution of intrathecal inflammation as assessed by Gd-enhanced MRI is a major effect of oral high-dose methylprednisolone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available