4.5 Article

Worsening renal function: What is a clinically meaningful change in creatinine during hospitalization with heart failure?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 13-25

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.3

Keywords

sensitivity; mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Worsening renal function during hospitalization for heart failure, defined as elevation in creatinine during admission, predicts adverse outcomes. Prior studies define worsening renal function using various creatinine elevations, but the relative value of definitions is unknown. Methods and Results: In a prospective cohort of 412 patients hospitalized for heart failure, we compared a spectrum of worsening renal function definitions (absolute creatinine elevations greater than or equal to0.1 to greater than or equal to0.5 mg/dL and 25% relative elevation from baseline) and associations with 6-month mortality, readmission, and functional decline. Creatinine elevation greater than or equal to0.1 mg/dL occurred in 75% of patients, and elevation greater than or equal to0.5 mg/dL occurred in 24% of patients. Risk of death rose with higher creatinine elevations (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 1.19, 1.67, 1.91, and 2.90 for elevations greater than or equal to0.1 to greater than or equal to0.5 mg/dL). Maximum sensitivity of any definition for predicting mortality was 75% and maximum specificity was 79%. High creatinine elevation was a more important predictor of death than was a single measure of baseline creatinine. Conclusions: Larger creatinine elevations predict highest risk of death, yet even minor changes in renal function are associated with adverse outcomes. The choice of a best definition for worsening renal function has implications for the number of patients identified with this risk factor and the magnitude of risk for mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available