4.6 Article

Role for the alternative complement pathway in ischemia/reperfusion injury

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 2, Pages 449-455

Publisher

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63839-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 52886, R56 HL056086, HL 56086, R01 HL052886, R01 HL056086] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [P60 AR 20614] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The terminal complement components play an important role in mediating tissue injury after ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats and mice. However, the specific complement pathways involved in I/R injury are unknown. The role of the alternative pathway in I/R injury may be particularly important, as it amplifies complement activation and deposition. In this study, the role of the alternative pathway in I/R injury was evaluated using factor D-deficient (-/-) and heterozygote (+/-) mice. Gastrointestinal ischemia (GI) was induced by clamping the mesenteric artery for 20 minutes and then reperfused for 3 hours. Sham-operated control mice (+/- versus -/-) had similar baseline intestinal lactate dehydrogenase activity (P = ns). intestinal lactate dehydrogenase activity was greater in -/- mice compared to +/- mice after GI/R (P = 0.02) thus demonstrating protection in the -/- mice. Intestinal myeloperoxidase activity in +/- mice was significantly greater than -/- mice after GI/R (P < 0.001). Pulmonary myeloperoxidase activity after GI/R was significantly higher in +/- than -/- mice (P = 0.03). Addition of human factor D to animals restored GI/R injury and was prevented by a functionally inhibitory antibody against human factor D. These data suggest that the alternative complement pathway plays an important role in local and remote tissue injury after GI/R. Inhibition of factor D may represent an effective therapeutic approach for GI/R injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available