4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 114-119

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00544.x

Keywords

Staphylococcus; catheter-related infections; ica gene; aap gene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To evaluate the usefulness of detecting two genes involved in biofilm formation (icaA and aap ) and one gene involved in initial adhesion (atlE ) for discrimination between contaminant, colonizing and invasive Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates involved in catheter-related infections. Patients The first group contained 29 isolates that were isolated from the skin of healthy volunteers (contaminant isolates). The second group contained 16 isolates recovered from catheters (>1000 CFUs on quantitative catheter culture) from asymptomatic patients without bacteremia. These isolates were considered to be colonizing isolates. The third group contained 34 isolates grown in greater than or equal to2 different blood cultures from patients with a systemic inflammatory response. These isolates were considered to be invasive isolates. Results The prevalence of atlE did not differ between the three groups. The icaA and aap genes were significantly more prevalent in colonizing isolates (88% aap ; 88% icaA ) than in invasive isolates (68% aap , P = 0.179; 59% icaA , P = 0.055) and than in skin isolates (52% aap , P = 0.02; 38% icaA , P = 0.002). Conclusions The high prevalence of aap and icaA in skin isolates and their higher prevalence in colonizing than in invasive isolates led to a low specificity when these genes were used to differentiate between contamination, colonization and invasive infection. We conclude that, although the prevalence of these genes differs in the three groups, their presence cannot be used for clinical decision-making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available