4.7 Article

An assessment of steam pasteurization and hot water immersion treatments for the microbiological decontamination of broiler carcasses

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 111-117

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-0020(02)00084-9

Keywords

decontamination; stream; immersion; Campylobacter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of steam pasteurization and hot water immersion treatments on the microbiological profile of whole broiler carcasses and thigh pieces were investigated. Hot water immersion of broiler thigh pieces for 10s at 80degreesC and 85degreesC resulted in significant reductions of 1.09 and 1.25 cfu g(-1) in total viable bacteria (Pless than or equal to0.05). Significant decreases in the numbers of thermophilic Campylobacter were observed on artificially contaminated skin samples following 10 s immersions in water maintained at 75degreesC, 80degreesC or 85degreesC (Pless than or equal to0.05). A 20s immersion in water at 80degreesC and 85degreesC resulted in significant reductions in the recovery of total viable bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae and Campylobacter (P<0.05). Statistically insignificant reductions in the counts of total viable bacteria together with levels of Enterobacteriaceae and thermophilic campylobacters were observed on broiler carcasses exposed to atmospheric steam at 90degreesC for 12 s when compared to untreated control carcasses. When the exposure time in the steam pasteurization chamber was increased to 24 s, significant reductions in the counts of these organisms were observed with 0.75, 0.69 and 1.3 log(10)cfu g(-1) decreases in total viable counts, Enterobacteriaceae and campylobacters, respectively (P<0.05). Visible damage to the outer epidermal skin tissue was observed in both the hot water immersion and steam pasteurization treatments used in the current study. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available