4.5 Article

Kinetics of mononuclear cell infiltration and cytokine expression in iodine-induced thyroiditis in the NOD-H2h4 mouse

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-4800(03)80002-3

Keywords

autoimmune thyroiditis; iodine; immunohistochemistry; cytokines; major histocompatibility complex

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-42174] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mononuclear cell infiltration of the thyroid gland is a common histologic feature of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis. Although the infiltrating mononuclear cells have been implicated in the destruction of the thyroid, information concerning the progression of infiltration into the thyroid is limited. In this report, we examine the composition and kinetics of mononuclear cell infiltration in the thyroid and the expression of major histocompatibility complex class II (I-A(k)), IL-12, and IFN-gamma in the thyroid of the NOD-H2(h4) mouse, a model of spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis accelerated by the administration of excess dietary iodine. Mice were given a low dose of 0.015% NaI in their drinking water for 2, 4, 6, 8, and 16 weeks, and thyroids were removed, serially sectioned, and stained in an avidin-biotin peroxidase assay. The thyroid infiltrate included CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, F4/80+ macrophages, and B220+ B cells. After 2 weeks of iodine treatment, CD4+ T cells were the first seen in the thyroid, followed by CD8+ T cells and F4/80+ macrophages. B220+ B cells entered the thyroid after 4 weeks of iodine treatment. IL-12 and IFN-gamma positive cells were located in the thyroid early in disease and were upregulated in the focal accumulations of infiltrating cells. Thyrocytes clearly expressed I-A(k) after 4 weeks of iodine treatment near the location of mononuclear cell infiltration. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available