4.8 Article

Enzymatic degradation behavior and mechanism of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) foams by trypsin

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 629-638

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00377-0

Keywords

poly(lactide-co-glycolidc); enzymatic degradation; hydrolytic degradation; trypsin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to investigate the enzymatic degradation behaviors of porous poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) foams in the presence of trypsin, in comparison with their hydrolytic degradation. To inspect the effect of trypsin oil tile degradation of PLGA, both the hydrolytic and enzymatic degradation of non-porous PLGA samples were also performed. The changes of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution (polydispersity) during the degradation were determined by gel permeation chromatograph. And the changes of weight, thickness and morphology with the degradation were also measured. The degradation of PLGA displayed as two stages. In the first stage, the molecular weight of PLGA decreased continuously with degradation time, whereas little weight loss occurred. But in the second stage, the molecular weight of PLGA had decreased to a low value and was almost unchanged with time, while the sample experienced significant weight loss. And it was found that the presence of trypsin could significantly accelerate the weight loss rates of all the PLGA samples, but it Caused little difference in the decrease of molecular weight and the change of PLGA composition between the enzymatic and hydrolytic degradation. Therefore, the enzymatic degradation of PLGA was still primarily a hydrolysis process. A mechanism of enzymatic degradation was proposed that the trypsin could enhance the weight loss of PLGA by acting as surfactant to push the dispersion of degradation products into water even though they could not dissolve in water. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available