4.7 Article

Viral load as a predictor of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages 519-524

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10846

Keywords

human papillomavirus; cervical neoplasia; cohort study; longitudinal analysis; viral load

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 70269] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HPV infections are believed to be a necessary cause of cervical cancer. Viral burden, as a surrogate indicator for persistence, may help predict risk of subsequent SIL. We used results of Ill test and cytology data repeated every 4-6 months in 2,081 women participating in a longitudinal study of the natural history of HPV infection and cervical neoplasia in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Using the MY09/11 PCR protocol, 473 women were positive for HPV DNA during the first 2 visits. We retested all positive specimens by a quantitative, low-stringency PCR method to measure viral burden in cervical cells. Mean viral loads and 95% CIs were calculated using log-transformed data. RRs and 95% CIs of incident SIL were calculated by proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and HPV oncogenicity. The risk of incident lesions increased with viral load at enrollment. The mean number of viral copies/cell at enrollment was 2.6 for women with no incident lesions and increased (trend p = 0.003) to 15.1 for women developing 3 or more SIL events over 6 years of follow-up. Compared to those with <1 copy per cell in specimens tested during the first 2 visits, Ill for incident SIL increased from 1.9 (95% CI 0.8-4.2) for those with 1-10 copies/cell to 4.5 (95% CI 1.9-10.7) for those with >1,000 copies/cell. The equivalent RR of HSIL for > 1,000 copies/cell was 2.6 (95% CI 0.5-13.2). Viral burden appears to have an independent effect on SIL incidence. Measurement of viral load, as a surrogate for HPV persistence, may identify women at risk of developing cervical cancer precursors. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available