Journal
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 93-100Publisher
WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.10922
Keywords
polyarteritis nodosa; microscopic polyangiitis; therapy; cyclophosphamide
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective. Because the optimal cyclophosphamide (CY) treatment duration for severe polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) without vir-us infection and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) has not been established, we conducted a trial to compare the effectiveness of 6 versus 12 CY pulses given in combination with corticosteroids (CS). Methods. Sixty-five (18 PAN, 47 MPA) previously untreated patients were randomized to receive 12 (n = 34) or 6 (n 31) CY pulses combined with CS. PAN and MPA were histologically proven or met ACR criteria. All patients presented greater than or equal to1 factor of severity according to the five factor score (FFS). CY pulses were administered every 2 weeks for 1 month, then every 4 weeks. The end point of the study was the number of events (relapses and/or deaths) occurring in each group, analyzed according to an intention-to-treat strategy. The outcome was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results. The baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. The mean (+/- SD) followup was 32 +/- 21 months. Survival analysis showed a significantly lower relapse probability (P = 0.02; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.34) and higher event-free survival (P = 0.02, HR = 0.44) for the 12 CY-pulse group while the mortality rates were not significantly different (P = 0.47). Conclusion. These results suggest that 6 CY pulses are less effective than 12 CY pulses to treat severe PAN and MPA, particularly with respect to the risk of relapses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available