4.7 Article

Natural history of benign solid and cystic thyroid nodules

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 315-318

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-07609] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-07529] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Thyroid nodules are common and most often benign. The natural history of benign thyroid nodules, however, is unclear. Objective: To determine the natural history of cytologically benign thyroid nodules using ultrasonography. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Single tertiary care clinic. Participants: All patients referred to the Brigham and Women's Hospital Thyroid Nodule Clinic, Boston, Massachusetts, who had benign cytologic results on ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration of a thyroid nodule between 1995 and 2000 and returned for a requested follow-up examination 1 month to 5 years later. Measurements: Nodule dimensions were measured at both visits, and growth was defined as an increase in calculated volume of 15% or greater. These results were correlated with the time between examinations, age, sex, baseline serum thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration, and cystic content of each nodule. Results: Nodule volume increased over time (P < 0.001). The estimated proportion of nodules with an increase in volume of 15% or greater after 5 years was 89%. Nodules with greater cystic content were less likely to grow than solid nodules (P = 0.01). Seventy-four of the 330 nodules were reaspirated on the second visit. Despite an average increase in volume of 69%, only 1 of 74 reaspirated nodules was malignant. Conclusion: Most solid, benign thyroid nodules grow. Therefore, an increase in nodule volume alone is not a reliable predictor of malignancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available