4.7 Article

The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 89S-95S

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)03019-X

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risk stratification in unstable angina (UA)/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) can provide an estimate of a patient's prognosis and optimize clinical choices. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score for UA/NSTEMI is an integrated approach that uses baseline variables that are part of the routine medical evaluation to identify patients at high risk for death and other major cardiac ischemic events. Using multivariable logistic regression, seven independent predictor variables were identified: age greater than or equal to 65 years, greater than or equal to 3 risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD), known CAD (stenosis greater than or equal to 50%), severe anginal symptoms ( greater than or equal to 2 anginal events in preceding 24 h), use of aspirin in the last seven days, ST-segment deviation greater than or equal to 0.05 mV, and elevated serum cardiac markers of necrosis. Each predictor carried similar prognostic weight; therefore, a risk score was constructed as the simple arithmetic sum of the number of predictors. The rate of death, MI, or urgent revascularization significantly increased as the TIMI risk score increased, ranging from < 5% for patients with a risk score of 0 or 1 to > 40% for patients with a risk score of 6 or 7. The risk score has been validated in several other trials of UAJNSTEMI. In addition, using the risk score to categorize patients also effectively defines a gradient for benefit with specific treatments such as low-molecular-weight heparins, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and an early invasive strategy. (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available