4.7 Article

Haploinsufficiency in combination with aging causes SCN5A-Linked hereditary Lenegre disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 643-652

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02864-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to investigate the genotype-to-phenotype relationship between SCN5A gene mutation and progressive cardiac conduction defect in order to gain insights into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of the disease. BACKGROUND Progressive cardiac conduction defect is a frequent disease commonly attributed to degeneration and fibrosis of the His bundle and its branches. In a French family, we have identified a splicing mutation in the SCN5A gene leading to hereditary progressive cardiac conduction defect. METHODS We have extended the size of the pedigree and phenotyped and genotyped all family members, and also investigated in vitro the functional consequences of the mutation. RESULTS Among 65 potentially affected members, 25 individuals were carriers of the IVS.22+2 T-->C SCN5A mutation. In relation to aging, gene carriers exhibit various types of conduction defects. P-wave, PR, and QRS duration increased progressively with age in gene carriers and in noncarriers. Whatever the age, conduction parameters were longer in gene carriers. The widening in the QRS complex with aging was more pronounced in gene carriers older than 40 years. Functional studies show that the IVS.22+2 T-->C SCN5A mutation lead to exon 22 skipping and to a complete loss of function of the affected allele, but to a normal trafficking of the mutated gene product. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that hereditary Lengre disease is caused by a haploinsufficiency mechanism, which in combination with aging leads to progressive alteration in conduction velocity. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:643-52) (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available