4.5 Article

Proteomic profiling of proteins associated with urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in a colon cancer cell line using an antisense approach

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 288-298

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200390042

Keywords

colon cancer; plasminogen activation and metastasis; urokinase plasminogen activator receptor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) strongly correlates with a malignant tumour cell phenotype. In the multistep process of metastasis, uPA binding to uPAR influences different cellular functions. In the present study, a highly metastatic colon cancer cell line, HCT116 was transfected with an expression vector containing a 5' uPAR cDNA fragment in an antisense orientation. This construct was most effective in reducing uPAR cell surface expression as confirmed by flow cytometry analysis. Antisense transfection of HCT116 cells had no effect on proliferation but the following effects were observed: (1) a 1.3-fold decreased adhesion; (2) a two-fold decreased Erk MAP kinase activity; (3) a 2.7-fold decrease in Src kinase activity; (4) a 1.5- and two-fold decrease in uPA cell surface expression and secretion; (5) abrogation of promatrix metalloproteinase-9 secretion; and (6) a complete suppression of plasminogen-dependent matrix degradation. Using proteomic analysis, we demonstrate loss of approximately 200 proteins and quantitative differences in the expression of 141 other proteins in an antisense-clone compared to wild-type and mock-transfected control. Such changes in protein expression with the down-regulation of uPAR may be an important contributor in colon cancer progression and metastasis and may not only provide a basis to develop a proteomic data bank of uPAR-mediated signaling molecules but may also lead to the development of therapeutic approaches for the cure and better management of colon cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available