4.5 Article

T cell Vβ repertoires in childhood vasculitides

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 3, Pages 517-527

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02081.x

Keywords

child; Kawasaki disease; superantigens; vasculitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Superantigens (SAgs) are potent stimulators of T cells bearing specific Vbeta T cell receptors (TCR) and may play a role in the aetiopathogenesis of systemic vasculitis, although this remains contentious. To investigate the possible aetiological role of SAgs, this study examined peripheral blood T cell Vbeta repertoires in children with systemic vasculitis. FACS analysis of 17 different peripheral blood T cell Vbeta families was performed in 20 healthy control children, 27 disease control children with nonvasculitic inflammatory disease, 25 children with primary systemic vasculitis, six patients with Kawasaki disease (KD) and six patients with Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP). There was a significantly increased variance of CD4 Vbeta12 and Vbeta 17, and CD8 Vbeta 1 in the primary systemic vasculitis group compared to control and disease controls. Moreover, 80% of the primary systemic vasculitis children had one or more CD4 Vbeta expansions or deletions, compared with 30% of controls (P < 0.002), and 37% of the disease controls (P < 0.002). In the KD group, the mean percentage of CD4 Vbeta 2 T cells was higher than in controls or disease controls. In the HSP group, there was no consistent skewing of the T cell Vbeta repertoire. We have observed changes in the T cell Vbeta repertoire in children with vasculitis over and above those observed in disease controls. While these data provide impetus for further research into this contentious field, they do not resolve unequivocally the question of the role of SAgs in childhood vasculitic syndromes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available