4.4 Article

Energy balance in a low pressure capacitive discharge driven by a double-saddle antenna

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 891-899

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.1555058

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A radio frequency (rf) plasma is created at low pressure (similar to1 mTorr) in the source tube of a helicon excited diffusion system in the absence of a dc magnetic field. The coupling is capacitive for the low source power of 160 W at 13.56 MHz considered here. Temperature measurements of the glass source tube yield a plasma power deposition of similar to35 W. The plasma parameters (density, potential, electron temperature) were measured using a retarding field energy analyzer. An analytical model based on the measured plasma parameters and on additional external parameters measured in the matching box (rf voltages and phase, rf current) is developed. The model takes into account the geometry of the double saddle rf antenna. It is found that the inside of the glass wall adjacent to the antenna wire charges negatively. Ion acceleration into the glass along the antenna and fast electrons escaping the plasma account for most of the power deposition to the walls (similar to16.8 W). Secondary electrons liberated by ions impinging onto the glass along the antenna contribute a power of similar to4.6 W. Adding the power of 3.7 W deposited to the part of the tube not affected by the antenna, the total power deposition responsible for the temperature rise of the tube is found to be about 25 W. The model shows that the power deposition is strongly nonuniform along the tube as a result of the antenna geometry. An estimate of the power deposited into the electrons by stochastic heating yields similar to1.4 W, compared to an estimate of 5.8 W for the measured power loss from electrons. (C) 2003 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available