4.3 Article

Vacant niche in alpine habitat:: the case of an introduced population of the butterfly Erebia epiphron in the Krkonose Mountains

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1146-609X(02)00004-8

Keywords

mountain environments; insect invasions; species distribution; community saturation; habitat partitioning; altitude

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A vacant niche in alpine habitats of the Krkonoge Mts. (Western Sudetes, Czech Republic) was colonised by a non-native butterfly Erebia epiphron (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) as a result of artificial introduction of 50 females in 1932 and 1933. The species established a large population occupying an entire area above the timberline on one of parallel ridges (East) of the mountains, but it has not yet colonised the parallel Western ridge, which is almost identical in area, altitude and vegetation. We compared altitudinal distribution and adult habitats of the alien species and of its native congener, E. euryale. Distribution of both species was significantly affected by altitude, but habitat type predicted butterfly numbers better than altitude in regression models. The introduced species was sympatric with the native one near the timberline, but its altitudinal optimum was higher, within tundra grasslands, where the native E. euryale did not occur. Peak adult emergence of E. euryale was later than in E. epiphron and followed identical pattern in allopatry. The failure of E. epiphron to colonise the Western ridge is attributable to its incapability to disperse across wooded areas. The Krkonoge alpine communities are unsaturated with species, which is striking in comparison with native butterfly fauna of lower Hruby Jesenik Mts. We interpret this by a past encroachment of alpine grasslands in the Krkonoge Mts. by the dwarf pine Pinus mugo. (C) 2003 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available