Journal
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 243-247Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.3.243
Keywords
color Doppler sonography; metastatic cancer; ovarian cancer; sonography
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective. To compare gray scale and color Doppler features of primary and metastatic ovarian carcinomas. Methods. Clinical, sonographic (gray scale and color Doppler), and histopathologic data of 143 patients with primary (n = 127 adnexal masses) and metastatic (n = 34 adnexal masses) ovarian cancer were reviewed. Morphologic gray scale parameters assessed were bilaterality, tumor volume, echogenicity, and presence of septa, papillary projections, or solid areas. Color Doppler parameters were presence of blood flow, tumor blood flow location (central versus peripheral), subjective impression of blood flow amount (scanty, moderate, or abundant), lowest resistive index, lowest pulsatility index, and maximal peak systolic velocity (centimeters per second). Results. No statistical differences were found in bilaterality, tumor volume, presence of septa, papillary projections or solid areas, presence of blood flow, tumor blood flow location, subjective impression of blood flow amount, lowest resistive index, lowest pulsatility index, and maximal peak systolic velocity. Metastatic carcinomas were more frequently purely solid tumors (47% versus 26%, P=.001; likelihood ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.7). Conclusions. The presence of a purely solid tumor indicates a higher probability of metastatic carcinoma than primary ovarian cancer However, with the use of gray scale and color Doppler sonography, it is difficult to differentiate primary ovarian carcinomas from metastatic tumors to the ovary.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available