4.3 Review

Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale

Journal

ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 121-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004

Keywords

stress; psychometrics; questionnaire

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1B5000978]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1B5000978] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review articles related to the psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Methods: Systematic literature searches of computerized databases were performed to identify articles on psychometric evaluation of the PSS. Results: The search finally identified 19 articles. Internal consistency reliability, factorial validity, and hypothesis validity of the PSS were well reported. However, the test-retest reliability and criterion validity were relatively rarely evaluated. In general, the psychometric properties of the 10-item PSS were found to be superior to those of the 14-item PSS, while those of the 4-item scale fared the worst. The psychometric properties of the PSS have been evaluated empirically mostly using populations of college students or workers. Conclusion: Overall, the PSS is an easy-to-use questionnaire with established acceptable psychometric properties. However, future studies should evaluate these psychometric properties in greater depth, and validate the scale using diverse populations. Copyright (C) 2012, Korean Society of Nursing Science. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available