Journal
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 44-52Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.1.44
Keywords
-
Funding
- OMHHE CDC HHS [T32 MN 19389] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To test for possible functional referentiality in a common domestic cat (Felis catus) vocalization, the authors conducted 2 experiments to examine whether human participants could classify meow sounds recorded from 12 different cats in 5 behavioral contexts. In Experiment 1, participants heard single calls, whereas in Experiment 2, bouts of calls were presented. In both cases, classification accuracy was significantly above chance, but modestly so. Accuracy for bouts exceeded that for single calls. Overall, participants performed better in classifying individual calls if they had lived with, interacted with, and had a general affinity for cats. These results provide little evidence of referentiality, suggesting instead that meows are nonspecific, somewhat negatively toned stimuli that attract attention from humans. With experience, human listeners can become more proficient at inferring positive-affect states from cat meows.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available