4.5 Article

Developmental regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated [3H]norepinephrine release from rat cerebellum

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 952-959

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01575.x

Keywords

locus coeruleus; nicotine; norepinephrine; ontogeny; transmitter release

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA 13332, DA 10612] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Presynaptic modulation of synaptic transmission is the primary function of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in developing and adult brain. nAChR activation regulates release of various neurotransmitters, including norepinephrine (NA). Given evidence that NA may serve a critical functional role in cerebellar development, we have undertaken studies to determine whether nAChRs modulate NA release in developing cerebellum. In vitro experiments using cerebellar slices examined the effects of nAChR stimulation on release of radiolabeled NA ([H-3]NA). Our data indicate the presence of functional nAChRs on NA terminals in immature cerebellum and subsequent developmental regulation of receptor properties. During postnatal week one, the maximally effective dose of nicotine released 35.0+/-1.2% of cerebellar [H-3]NA stores. There was a subsequent decline in maximal nicotine-stimulated NA release until postnatal day 30, when E-max values were statistically indistinguishable from adult. Although the efficacy of nicotine changed substantially throughout development, EC50 values did not differ significantly (EC50=4.4-12.0 mum). Pharmacological analysis indicated that this developmental shift in maximum nicotine effect reflects a change in the properties of the nAChRs. These data support recent findings of a possible functional role of nAChRs in regulating cerebellar ontogeny, and provides further support for the role of NA as a neurotrophic factor during development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available