4.7 Article

Suppression subtractive hybridization identifies distinctive expression markers for coronary and internal mammary arteries

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 425-433

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000059303.94760.5C

Keywords

suppression subtractive hybridization; coronary artery; mammary artery; gene expression; arterial phenotype

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL50566, R01 HL090653-04, R29 HL050566, R01 HL104068, R01 HL050566, R01 HL090653] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-We sought to identify differentially expressed genes in the athero-prone coronary artery and athero-resistant internal mammary arteries. Methods and Results-Using suppressive subtraction hybridization, we generated reciprocal cDNA collections of representative mRNAs specific to porcine coronary arteries versus porcine mammary arteries. We screened 1000 suppressive subtraction hybridization cDNA clones by dot blot array and sequenced 600 of those showing the most marked expression differences. Northern blot, in situ hybridization, and immunostaining confirmed the differential gene expression patterns identified by the dot blot arrays. Genes associated with mammary arteries included claudin-10 and h-cadherin, which are genes associated with tight junctions and intermediate junctions. In contrast, genes associated with proatherosclerotic processes, such as lipid retention and metabolism, inflammation, and cell growth, were preferentially expressed in coronary arteries. Conclusions-Normal coronary arteries have gene expression program that is significantly different than internal mammary arteries. These differences may partly explain the resistance of coronary arteries and internal mammary arteries to atherosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available