Journal
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 5, Pages 2461-2468Publisher
AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2461
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIAID NIH HHS [AI42518] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Memory T cells exhibit a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of their phenotype and functional characteristics. It has been proposed that the CCR7 chemokine receptor divides memory T cell populations into central memory T cells and effector memory T cells with distinct functions in secondary immune responses. We were interested whether this hypothesis holds true in experiments performed on Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells. To identify CCR7(+) cells, we engineered a fluorescent ligand for CCR7; results with the new CC chemokine ligand 19 chemotetramer were verified by staining with a CCR7 mAb. Staining with the CC chemokine ligand 19 chemotetramer reveals two subsets within CCR7(+) cells: a CCR7(int) population containing memory cells and a CCR7 high population containing naive T cells. Phenotypic analysis of MHC class I/peptide tetramer-positive cells revealed that HLA-A2-restricted CMV-specific CD8 T cells exhibit the lowest percentage of CCR7(+) cells (0.5-5%), while HLA-A2-restricted flu- and HLA-B8-restricted EBV-specific CD8 T cells showed the highest (45-70%). Intracellular staining of unstimulated cells revealed that both CCR7(int)- and CCR7(-)-specific CD8 T cells exhibit a detectable level of perforin. Both CCR7(int) and CCR7(-) Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells produced IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha following short-term peptide stimulation. Therefore, our finding that CCR7(+)CD8(+) T cells are able to exert immediate effector functions requires a substantial revision to the central and effector memory hypothesis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available