4.3 Article

Neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of youths' externalizing behaviors: A multilevel analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1-2, Pages 35-53

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023018502759

Keywords

neighborhood; behavior problems; parenting; social capital; longitudinal

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD030572] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [K05 DA015226-01, K05 DA015226] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH056961-02, R01 MH056961, R01 MH042498] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Associations among neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of externalizing behavior problems were investigated in a longitudinal sample of early adolescents (from age 11 to 13). Mothers' reports of parental monitoring (at age 11), mothers' and youths' reports of the amount of youths' unsupervised time (at age 11), and youths' reports of positive parental involvement (at age 12) were used to predict initial levels (at age 11) and growth rates in youths' externalizing behavior as reported by teachers. Census-based measures of neighborhood structural disadvantage, residential instability, and concentrated affluence were expected to moderate the effects of parenting processes (e. g., parental monitoring) on externalizing behavior. Hierarchical linear modeling results revealed that less parental monitoring was associated with more externalizing behavior problems at age 11, and more unsupervised time spent out in the community (vs. unsupervised time in any context) and less positive parental involvement were associated with increases in externalizing behavior across time. Furthermore, the decrease in externalizing levels associated with more parental monitoring was significantly more pronounced when youths lived in neighborhoods with more residential instability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available