4.7 Article

Mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-II receptor expression levels during the progression from normal human mammary tissue to invasive breast carcinomas

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 635-642

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00627-5

Keywords

M6P/IGFII receptor; cathepsin D; tumour suppressor; benign breast disease; in situ mammary carcinoma; invasive breast carcinoma; carcinogenesis; immunohistochemistry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The putative role of mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-II receptor (M6P/IGFII-R) as a tumour suppressor and its value as a prognostic marker of breast cancer was studied in 42 benign breast diseases (BBD), 61 in situ carcinomas (CIS) and 133 invasive carcinomas. The receptor was quantified by immunohistochemistry with a computerised image analyser, using specific polyclonal IGY antibodies. The M6P/IGFII-R level varied markedly according to the different patient samples, but median values and distributions were similar in lesions and normal adjacent glands. However, the receptor level was significantly increased in high-grade ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and decreased in invasive carcinomas relative to adjacent normal tissue. The M6P/IGFII-R protein concentration in invasive breast carcinomas was mostly independent of prognostic parameters: tumour size, histological grade, lymph node (N) invasiveness and oestrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) status. The only positive correlation was with cathepsin D, the progesterone receptor (PgR) and with patients aged > 60 years. These results do not support the hypothesis of a frequent and early inactivation of the M6P/IGFII-R gene in breast cancer. Clinical follow-up of patients might reveal a prognostic value for one of the cathepsin receptors. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available