4.5 Article

On-line coupling of size exclusion and capillary zone electrophoresis via a reversed-phase C18 trapping column for the analysis of structurally related enkephalins in cerebrospinal fluid

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 897-903

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200390113

Keywords

capillary zone electrophoresis; cerebrospinal fluid; multidimensional separation; peptide; size-exclusion chromatography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On-line coupled analytical techniques can be advantageous in the assay of smaller peptides in complex biological matrices such as plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and tissues. The present study shows the feasibility of a recently developed system, consisting of a size-exclusion chromatographic (SEC) separation followed by a trapping procedure on an RP18 microcolumn with subsequent elution of the trapped fraction and separation by capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) for the quantification of structural-related peptides in biological matrices, as demonstrated for a number of enkephalins in CSF. After SEC separation of the enkephalins from large proteins present in CSF a heart-cut of 200 muL, containing the enkephalin peak, is taken, concentrated on the RP18 microcolumn and, after elution of the enkephalins with 80% acetonitrile, a fraction of the eluate is electrokinetically injected into the CZE system, where stacking and separation is achieved. The degradation of the peptides, caused by endogenous peptidases in the matrix, is sufficiently inhibited with imipramine HCl. The assay has a satisfactory linearity and intraday (9.70-16.3%) precision considering the complexity of this multidimensional separation system. The sensitivity of the method, with a concentration limit of quantification of 2.5 mug/mL, is comparable with other CZE assays for peptides and sufficient for the quantification of peptide drugs in biological matrices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available