4.7 Article

The diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction beyond the Hartree-Fock approximation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 118, Issue 9, Pages 3921-3927

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1540626

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on evaluation of the diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction (DBOC) to the electronic energy with Hartree-Fock (HF) and conventional correlated wave functions for general molecular systems. Convergence of both HF and configuration interaction (CI) DBOC with the one-particle basis seems to be rather fast, with triple-zeta quality correlation consistent sets of Dunning sufficiently complete to approach the respective basis set limits for the DBOC of the ground state of H-2 within 0.1 cm(-1). Introduction of electron correlation via the CI singles and doubles method has a substantial effect on the absolute value of the DBOC for H-2, H2O, and BH in their ground states (ca. +13 cm(-1) out of 115 cm(-1), +22 cm(-1) out of 622 cm(-1), and +11 cm(-1) out of 370 cm(-1), respectively). The effect of the correlation correction to the DBOC on relative energies is small, e.g., the barrier to linearity of water changes by ca. 1 cm(-1); however, the value is difficult to converge to the ab initio limit. Based on recent results by Schwenke [J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2352 (2001)] and our findings, we expect the correlation correction to the DBOC to have a substantial effect on spectroscopic properties of the ground state of water. The effect of DBOC on equilibrium bond distance r(e) and harmonic vibrational frequency omega(e) of the ground state of BH is +0.0007 Angstrom and -2 cm(-1), respectively. Surprisingly, the former is a much larger change than expected, and greater than errors due to residual incompleteness of electron correlation treatment and basis set in state-of-the-art conventional Born-Oppenheimer computations. The effect of using a correlated wave function for the DBOC evaluation on the above corrections to r(e) and omega(e) is small. (C) 2003 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available