4.7 Article

Glucose regulates monocyte adhesion through endothelial production of interleukin-8

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 371-377

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000061714.74668.5C

Keywords

interleukin-8; diabetes; endothelium; AP-1; carbohydrate response element

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have shown that glucose increases monocyte adhesion to human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) in vitro.(1) In the present study, we examined mechanisms by which glucose stimulates monocyte: endothelial interactions. HAECs cultured for 7 days in 25 mmol/L glucose had a 2-fold elevation in interleukin-8 (IL-8) secretion over control cells cultured in 5.5 mmol/L glucose (P<0.001). Use of a neutralizing antibody to IL-8 prevented glucose-mediated monocyte adhesion. Both glucose and IL-8 activated β(1) integrin on the HAEC surface, suggesting that both activate the α(5)β(1) integrin complex on the endothelial surface. The α(5)β(1) integrin complex is important for anchoring connecting segment-1 fibronectin on the HAEC surface for monocyte adhesion. Analysis of the human IL-8 promoter revealed binding sites for NF-κB and AP-1 as well as several aligned carbohydrate response elements (also known as E-boxes). Glucose dramatically stimulated IL-8 promoter activity. Using mutated IL-8 promoter constructs and EMSA, we found that the AP-1 element and the glucose-response element were responsible for much of the glucose-mediated activation of IL-8 transcription. Interestingly, inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production through use of pharmacological uncouplers of the mitochondrial electron transport chain significantly reduced glucose-mediated induction of IL-8 expression. These data indicate that glucose regulates monocyte: endothelial interactions through stimulation of IL-8 and ROS production and activation of the α(5)β(1) integrin complex on HAECs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available