4.6 Article

The factor IX γ-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) domain is involved in interactions between factor IX and factor XIa

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 278, Issue 10, Pages 7981-7987

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M212748200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58837] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During hemostasis, factor IX is activated to factor IXabeta by factor VIIa and factor XIa. The glutamic acid-rich gamma-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) domain of factor IX is involved in phospholipid binding and is required for activation by factor VIIa. In contrast, activation by factor XIa is not phospholipid-dependent, raising questions about the importance of the Gla for this reaction. We examined binding of factors IX and IXabeta to factor XIa by surface plasmon resonance. Plasma factors IX and IXabeta bind to factor XIa with K-d values of 120 +/- 11 nm and 110 +/- 8 nm, respectively. Recombinant factor IX bound to factor XIa with a Kd of 107 nm, whereas factor IX with a factor VII Gla domain (rFIX/VII-Gla) and factor IX expressed in the presence of warfarin (rFIX-desgamma) did not bind. An anti-factor IX Gla monoclonal antibody was a potent inhibitor of factor IX binding to factor XIa (K-i 34 nm) and activation by factor XIa (Ki 33 nm). In activated partial thromboplastin time clotting assays, the specific activities of plasma and recombinant factor IX were comparable (200 and 150 units/mg), whereas rFIX/VII-Gla activity was low (<2 units/mg). In contrast, recombinant factor IXabeta and activated rFIX/VIIa-Gla had similar activities (80 and 60% of plasma factor IXabeta), indicating that both proteases activate factor X and that the poor activity of zymogen rFIX/VII-Gla was caused by a specific defect in activation by factor XIa. The data demonstrate that factor XIa binds with comparable affinity to factors IX and IXabeta and that the interactions are dependent on the factor IX Gla domain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available