4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of preparation conditions on gold/Y-type zeolite for CO oxidation

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 41, Issue 1-2, Pages 83-95

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00195-9

Keywords

gold; Y-type zeolite; CO oxidation; gold solution; concentrations; temperature; pH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of preparation conditions (i.e. chloroauric acid concentration, pH of gold solution, solution temperature, and mixing time) on gold supported on Y-type zeolite (Au/Y) for CO oxidation were studied. The catalysts were characterized by AA temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), XRD, TEM and XPS in order to understand the correlation of the gold precursors in the solution and the gold particles in Y-type zeolite to the catalytic activity. It was found that more gold species prepared in the supercage of Y-type zeolite would enhance Au/Y with higher catalytic activity. However, higher pH, higher gold concentration and lower temperature would generate more and larger gold species in the solution, which caused large gold particles prepared on the exterior surface of Au/Y. Due to the limited surface area, these large particles provided little activity for the reaction. Moreover, lower pH and lower gold concentration would generate more gold monomers in the solution at higher solution temperature, which caused more gold species prepared in the sodalite cage of ALIN. Due to molecular sieving effect, they were not available for CO oxidation. It can be concluded from this study that Au/Y prepared from a gold solution with surface acidity modified Y-type zeolite (I g of zeolite per 125 ml solution), with initial gold concentration around 1.46 x 10(-3) M, solution pH at 6, solution temperature around 80degreesC, and mixing time for I h would possess an optimum catalytic activity for CO oxidation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All tights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available