4.7 Article

Selective extractions to assess the biogeochemically relevant fractionation of inorganic mercury in sediments and soils

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 479, Issue 2, Pages 233-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01550-7

Keywords

mercury; speciation; sediment; sequential extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we present a new method for sequential selective extractions (SSEs) for Hg in geological solids, validated with extensive quality assurance procedures. Mercury was separated into fractions which make sense biogeochemically, rather than being identified by specific compounds. Experiments elucidated the effects of extraction time, solids-to-liquid ratio, and alternate solvents in natural samples, reference materials, and pure compounds. Compounds tested included HgS (red and black), HgCl2, Hg-0, (HgCl2)-Cl-2, HgSe, HgO, Hg(II) adsorbed on goethite, Hg-humate, and gold amalgamated Hg. Based on these findings, a five-step sequence of extractions was established to separate the compounds into biogeochemically distinct categories. The fractions and leaching media were as follows: F1 (deionized water), F2 (0.01 M HCl + 0.1 M CH3COOH), F3 (1 M KOH), F4 (12 M HNO3) and F5 (aqua regia). Method blanks and method detection limits (MDLs) of 0.1-5 ng/g were obtained for the various analytical fractions, depending on the reagent concentrations used. Precision ranged from 2 to 8% for the major fractions in a sample, but increased to 2-40% for fractions making up <5% of the total. Recovery of total Hg by the sum of species in reference materials showed that the accuracy of the method ranges from 90 to 105%. Methylation potential, determined by anoxic incubation sample aliquots with biologically active sediments, showed that inorganic Hg extracted in the F3 fraction is most strongly correlated with methylation potential. In most natural and sediment incubation samples, the majority of Hg present was found either in the F3 or F5 fractions. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available