4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Activity in methane combustion and sensitivity to sulfur poisoning of La1-xCexMn1-yCoyO3 perovskite oxides

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 41, Issue 1-2, Pages 71-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00194-7

Keywords

catalytic methane combustion; cobalt-manganese-based perovskites; sensitivity to sulfur poisoning; effect of Ce substitution on catalytic performance of La-Co-Mn perovskites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activity in methane combustion and sensitivity to sulfur poisoning of a series of perovskite type oxides La1-xCexMn1-y CoyO3 (X = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and y = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7), prepared by the citrate method were investigated. The citrate method and calcination 5 h at 973 K gave homogeneous oxides exhibiting the XRD pattern typical of perovskite structure, with traces of ceria when x greater than or equal to 0.1. Specific surface areas were from 10 to 31 m(2)/g, depending on composition. In general, these catalysts were less active than the La1-xCeCoO3 and La1-xCeMnO3 compositions with x = 0-0.5, except LaCoO3. No gain in performance was observed by mutual Co and Mn B-site substitution. As expected, all these catalysts are sensitive to sulfur dioxide (or H2S) in the feed, but the rate of poisoning varies significantly with composition. A low degree of substitution by cerium seems to slow the poisoning process. La0.9Ce0.1 CoO3, La0.8Ce0.2CoO3 and La0.8Ce0.2MnO3 compositions were the least sensitive. After 15 h exposure at 823 K to 20 ppm SO2 added to the feed, conversion of 1% methane to CO2 remained more than 80% of the original. XPS analysis of spent samples showed the presence of surface S6+ species, even when no bulk sulfate formation was detected by XRD. However, XRD analysis of samples exposed 40 h to 80 ppm SO2 (or H2S) indicates partial catalyst decomposition with the formation of La-2(SO4)(3), CeO2 and Co3O4. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available