4.8 Review

In situ generation of carbenes:: A general and versatile platform for organocatalytic living polymerization

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 125, Issue 10, Pages 3046-3056

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja021084+

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A metal-free, organocatalytic approach to living polymerization using N-heterocyclic carbenes as nucleophilic catalysts generated and used in situ in a single-pot process is detailed. The N-heterocyclic carbene catalyst platform is extremely versatile, as the nature of the substituents has a pronounced effect of catalyst stability and activity toward different substrates. The generation of imidazolium- and thiazaolium-based carbenes was accomplished from the reaction of the corresponding salts with the appropriate bases. This allowed the rapid screening of libraries of catalysts that provided a basic understanding of catalyst structure (sterics, electronics, etc.) with the polymerization rate, control, substrate, and range of molecular weights. The imidazole-based catalysts were significantly more active toward ROP than the thiazolium-based analogues. No appreciable differences between imidazol-2-ylidene and imidazolin-2-ylidene catalysts were observed. Less sterically demanding carbenes were found to be more active toward ring-opening polymerization (ROP) than their sterically encumbered analogues for lactone polymerization. These data prompted the investigation of ionic liquid as a precatalyst reservoir in a phase-transfer polymerization with an immiscible THF solution of monomer and initiator. In situ activation of the ionic liquid generates carbene that migrates to the organic phase effecting living ROP. Precatalyst (ionic liquid) regeneration terminates polymerization. This simple reaction/recycle protocol readily allows repetitive ROPs from the ionic liquid using commercially available materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available