4.6 Article

Inactivation of ICa-L is the major determinant of use-dependent facilitation in rat cardiomyocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 547, Issue 3, Pages 797-805

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033340

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two models have been proposed to explain facilitation of the L-type calcium current (ICa-L). A positive feedback model proposes that calcium released during a conditioning pulse (I-1) facilitates the subsequent pulse (I-2) via calmodulin/calmodulin kinase 11 (CaMKII) mechanisms. The negative feedback model proposes that the calcium release of each pulse feeds back on itself via calcium-dependent inactivation. The relative physiological roles were evaluated in rat ventricular myocytes. Paired pulses (450 ms interpulse interval) elicited facilitation (I-2 of 872 +/- 145 versus I-1 of 777 +/- 132 pA, P < 0.01). Inactivation time (T-0.37) was prolonged for I-2 versus I-1 (22 +/- 2 and 16 +/- 2 ms, P > 0.01). Evidence for the negative feedback mechanism includes: (a) ryanodine (0.3 mm) eliminated facilitation, surprisingly by increasing the amplitude of I-1 more than that of I-2 (1039 +/- 216 and 977 +/- 186 pA) and eliminated the difference in T-0.37 between I-2 and I-1 (33.1 +/- 4.5 versus 32.5 +/- 4.6 ms); (b) an outward I-2, which does not trigger sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release, eliminated facilitation even when it was conditioned by an inward I-1; (c) facilitation decayed as the I-1 - I-2 interval lengthened (time constant (tau) = 16.9 +/- 1.4 s); (d) thapsigargin (0. 1 mum) slowed this decay (tau = 43.8 +/- 11.7 s) whereas isoproterenol accelerated it (tau = 5.6 +/- 1.4 s, P < 0.01) and T-0.37 paralleled this decay; and (e) the magnitude of ICa-L was negatively correlated with the sodium-calcium exchange current (I-Na/Ca) elicited by the SR-Ca2+ release. In conclusion, Ca2+-dependent inactivation Of ICa-L is the major mechanism underlying facilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available