4.7 Article

Interferon and granulopoiesis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 197, Issue 6, Pages 711-723

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20021553

Keywords

microarray; immature granulocytes; glucocorticoid; leukocytes; autoimmunity

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [N01AI05412, N01-AI-05412] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR46589-01, R01 AR046589] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototype systemic autoimmune disease characterized by flares of high morbidity. Using oligonucleotide microarrays, we now show that active SLE can be distinguished by a remarkably homogeneous gene expression pattern with overexpression of granulopoiesis-related and interferon (IFN)-induced genes. Using the most stringent statistical analysis (Bonferroni correction), 15 genes were found highly up-regulated in SLE patients, 14 of which are targets of IFN and one, defensin DEFA-3, a major product of immature granulocytes. A more liberal correction (Benjamini and Hochberg correction) yielded 18 additional genes, 12 of which are IFN-regulated and 4 granulocyte-specific. Indeed immature neutrophils were identified in a large fraction of SLE patients white blood cells. High dose glucocorticoids, a standard treatment of disease flares, shuts down the interferon signature, further supporting the role of this cytokine in SLE. The expression of 10 genes correlated with disease activity according to the SLEDAI. The most striking correlation (P<0.001, r=0.55) was found with the formyl peptide receptor-like 1 protein that mediates chemotactic activities of defensins. Therefore, while the IFN signature confirms the central role of this cytokine in SLE, microarray analysis of blood cells reveals that immature granulocytes may be involved in SLE pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available