4.7 Article

Pilot-scale peroxidation (H2O2) of sewage sludge

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 98, Issue 1-3, Pages 91-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00287-X

Keywords

sludge; dewaterability; oxidation; H2O2; pilot-scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants produce large amounts of sludge. This excess sludge is an inevitable drawback inherent to the waste activated sludge process. Both the reduction of the amount of sludge produced and improving its dewaterability are of paramount importance. Novel pre-treatment processes have been developed in order to improve sludge dewatering, handling and disposal. This paper discusses the oxidation process utilising the catalytic activation of H2O2 by iron salts, referred to as Fenton's reagent. In previous work, the authors described the experimental laboratory results of H2O2-oxidation of thickened sludge. Based upon the optimum conditions obtained in these laboratory tests, pilot-scale experiments are conducted. Peroxidation under its optimum conditions, i.e. (i) through addition of 25 g H2O2 kg(-1) DS (dry solids content), (ii) in the presence of 1.67 g Fe2+-ions kg(-1) DS, (iii) at pH 3, and (iv) at ambient temperature and pressure, significantly reduces the amounts of sludge and improves the product quality: the amount DS per equivalent inhabitant per day (DS/IE.d) was reduced from 60 to 33.1 g DS/IE.d and the percentage DS of the sludge cake was 47%, which is high compared with the 20-25% achieved in a traditional sludge dewatering facility. An economic assessment for a wastewater treatment plant of 300 000 IE confirms the benefits. Considering the fixed and variable costs and the savings obtained when the sludge is incinerated after dewatering, a net saving of approx. 950 000 E per year or 140 E per ton DS can be expected. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available