4.2 Article

Climate Variability and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Hanoi, Viet Nam, During 2008 to 2015

Journal

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 532-541

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1010539518790143

Keywords

dengue fever; dengue hemorrhagic fever; climate variability; humidity; rainfall; temperature; Hanoi; Viet Nam

Funding

  1. Research Links Project on Climate Change and Health between Umea University, Sweden
  2. Hanoi University of Public Health
  3. Hanoi Medical University
  4. Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dengue fever/dengue hemorrhagic fever (DF/DHF) has been an important public health challenge in Viet Nam and worldwide. This study was implemented in 2016-2017 using retrospective secondary data to explore associations between monthly DF/DHF cases and climate variables during 2008 to 2015. There were 48175 DF/DHF cases reported, and the highest number of cases occurred in November. There were significant correlations between monthly DF/DHF cases with monthly mean of evaporation (r = 0.236, P < .05), monthly relative humidity (r = -0.358, P < .05), and monthly total hours of sunshine (r = 0.389, P < .05). The results showed significant correlation in lag models but did not find direct correlations between monthly DF/DHF cases and monthly average rainfall and temperature. The study recommended that health staff in Hanoi should monitor DF/DHF cases at the beginning of epidemic period, starting from May, and apply timely prevention and intervention measures to avoid the spreading of the disease in the following months. A larger scale study for a longer period of time and adjusting for other potential influencing factors could better describe the correlations, modelling/projection, and developing an early warning system for the disease, which is important under the impacts of climate change and climate variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available