4.5 Article

Calretinin/PSA-NCAM immunoreactive granule cells after hippocampal damage produced by kainic acid and DEDTC treatment in mouse

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 966, Issue 2, Pages 206-217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04164-1

Keywords

adult neurogenesis; epilepsy model; hippocampal granule cell; hilar mossy cell

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a dramatic increase in the number of lightly immunoreactive calretinin cells in,the granular layer of the dentate gyrus of the mouse hippocampus 1 day after excitotoxic injury using kainic acid combined with the zinc chelator diethyidithiocarbamate. At 7 days after treatment, these cells are strongly immunoreactive for calretinin and for the polysialated form of the glycoprotein neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM). The reexpression of calretinin and PSA-NCAM after treatment corresponds well with the loss of input from the damaged hilar mossy cells. These cells could be considered immature granule cells since they are immunoreactive to markers for immature cells such as PSA-NCAM, and are not immunoreactive to calbindin D28k and neuronal nuclear specific protein NeuN (present in mature granule cells), or GABA (present in interneurons). Ultrastructural analysis of these cells indicates that they are immature. Labelling of cell proliferation with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) shows that by day 1 no calretinin immunoreactive cell of the dentate gyrus corresponds to newly generated cells. By day 7 only 6% of the calretinin immunoreactive cells in the dentate gyrus are marked for BrdU. Our data indicate that the CR/PSA-NCAM immunoreactive cells of the dentate gyrus, in spite of their immature characteristics, are not the products of reactive neurogenesis. These cells could represent a reservoir of pre-existing not completely differentiated granule cells that react to damage. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available