4.3 Article

Properties of the periplasmic nitrate reductases from Paracoccus pantotrophus and Escherichia coli after growth in tungsten-supplemented media

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 220, Issue 2, Pages 261-269

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00122-8

Keywords

nitrate reductase; molybdenum; tungsten; enzyme activity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paracoccus pantotrophus grown anaerobically under denitrifying conditions expressed similar levels of the periplasmic nitrate reductase (NAP) when cultured in molybdate- or tungstate-containing media. A native PAGE gel stained for nitrate reductase activity revealed that only NapA from molybdate-grown cells displayed readily detectable nitrate reductase activity. Further kinetic analysis showed that the periplasmic fraction from cells grown on molybdate (3 muM) reduced nitrate at a rate of V-max = 3.41 +/- 0.16 mumol [NO3-] min(-1) mg(-1) with an affinity for nitrate of Km = 0.24 +/- 0.05 mM and was heat-stable up to 50degreesC. In contrast, the periplasmic fraction obtained from cells cultured in media supplemented with tungstate (100 muM) reduced nitrate at a much slower rate, with much lower affinity V-max = 0.05 +/- 0.002 mumol [NO3-] min(-1) mg(-1) and K-m = 3.91 +/- 0.45 mM) and was labile during prolonged incubation at > 20degreesC. Nitrate-dependent growth of Escherichia coli strains expressing only nitrate reductase A was inhibited by sub-mM concentrations of tungstate in the medium. In contrast, a strain expressing only NAP was only partially inhibited by 10 mM tungstate. However, none of the above experimental approaches revealed evidence that tungsten could replace molybdenum at the active site of E. coli NapA. The combined data show that tungsten can function at the active site of some, but not all, molybdoenzymes from mesophilic bacteria. (C) 2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available